[cfe-dev] Getting fully qualified names of random qualtypes.

[Philippe Canal via cfe-dev]

Hi Sterling,

 > Apparently Clang doesn't allow file-level authorship comments, so I'll
 > remove that detail if it is OK with you.

It is okay with us.  Could you add an authorship/provenance information in the commit log
or a credit file if there is one.

Thanks
Philippe.

On 10/26/15 11:34 AM, Sterling Augustine wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Vassil Vassilev <vvasilev at cern.ch> wrote:
>> On 23/10/15 21:06, Sterling Augustine wrote:
>>> Also, I want to be sure the Cling project is OK with the way it is
>>> attributed. Happy to work with you all however you like there.
>>>
>> I am more than happy to attribute this part of the code. I'd like as many
>> parts of cling as possible to go upstream.
>>
>> Could you add Phillipe as a co-author? Eg.
>>
>> +// author:  Vassil Vassilev<vasil.georgiev.vasilev at cern.ch>
>> +// author:  Philippe Canal <pcanal at fnal.gov>
>>
>> Out of curiosity: what do you need this for?
> I'm working on a tool that examines a header file and describes
> exactly how one would call the functions it declares--detects the
> namespaces and classes they are in. As part of that, it needs to
> determine how to declare the types of the parameters they take.
>
> Apparently Clang doesn't allow file-level authorship comments, so I'll
> remove that detail if it is OK with you. If it isn't, I'll just
> incorporate cling/AST.[cpp|h]  directly into my own project--that will
> be quicker than the reformatting and refactoring rabbit hole anyway.