[cfe-dev] Small patches to allow fully independent clang/llvm/compiler-rt/libc++

[C Bergström via cfe-dev]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Vasileios Kalintiris
<Vasileios.Kalintiris at imgtec.com> wrote:
>> I've been told Musl (http://www.musl-libc.org/) works well as a glibc
>> replacement for OpenEmbedded on AArch64, and it even interoperates
>> better than expected with libc++.
>>
>> Not sure about the other targets, but may be worth considering.
>
> I'm able to build a GNU-free toolchain with Musl for the new mips-mti-linux
> triple (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13340). We are passing the LLVM test-suite
> for static builds with MIPS32 O32 LE/BE. It should be working fine on other
> targets too.

That's cool, but it depends on a triple flag. I really would like and
need something which doesn't depend on the user messing with compiler
flags.

Is the consensus around here really so extremely strong against a
build time option or just a few people who speak up?