[cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] "Living Downstream Without Drowning" BOF @ Dev Meeting

[Renato Golin via cfe-dev]

On 5 November 2015 at 09:18, David Chisnall via cfe-dev
<cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> but it would be good if we could have a stronger policy that stuff that is reverted goes into Phabricator and is not recommitted until the person who initially reverted it has signed off (or, at least, there’s a strong consensus that it’s the right thing).

I'm not sure we have that as a policy, but I assume this is the
consensus. Though, sometimes, it happens. I'd say, if that was the
only big problem you had in 4000 commits, means even with the revert
policy, the tree is pretty stable. :)

--renato