[cfe-dev] LLVM IRC channel flooded?

[Chris Matthews]

By chars in message 37%:

 chandlerc            358
 BenL                 455
 r4nt                 479
 majnemer             509
 green-dragon-bot     879
 jyknight             965
 nlewycky            1002
 bb-chapuni          1090
 echristo            2469
 llvmbb              6381

 total                 22145

Percent chars sender each:

chandlerc          1.616618%
 BenL               2.054640%
 r4nt               2.163016%
 majnemer           2.298487%
 green-dragon-bot   3.969293%
 jyknight           4.357643%
 nlewycky           4.524723%
 bb-chapuni         4.922104%
 echristo          11.149244%
 llvmbb            28.814631%


> On May 20, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> Just out of curiosity, what's the percentage in volume (chars), not just lines?
> 
> On 20 May 2015 9:29 pm, "Chris Matthews" <chris.matthews at apple.com <mailto:chris.matthews at apple.com>> wrote:
> I did a quick data mine on May’s IRC log.  Bot traffic is 24% of total.  Top IRC posters:
> 
>  llvmbb              1434
>  echristo             334
>  majnemer             320
>  Fiora                286
>  bb-chapuni           237
>  chandlerc            236
>  jroelofs             199
>  myeisha              160
>  green-dragon-bot     140
>  compnerd             124
>  nlewycky             120
>  EricWF               117
>  AaronBallman         114
>  jyknight             113
>  nbjoerg              113
> 
> 
>> On May 20, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com <mailto:jonathan at codesourcery.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/19/15 9:01 AM, Jonathan Roelofs wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 5/19/15 8:58 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
>>>> On 19 May 2015 at 15:48, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com <mailto:jonathan at codesourcery.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Also, perhaps the URLs should be shortened?
>>>> 
>>>> That's a good idea.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> The format could be: [botname]: [buildername] [short_url]
>>>>> ("Passed"|"Failed:" [usernames])
>>>> 
>>>> The only reason to show "Passed" results is if they were failing
>>>> before, as a confirmation that whatever you did to fix, worked.
>>>> Otherwise, they're just noise.
>>> 
>>> Good point.
>>> 
>>> [botname]: [buildername] [short_url] [revision] ("Fixed:"|"FAILED:")
>>> [usernames]
>>> 
>>> Should the bots blame people for fixes?
>> 
>> I filed a feature request ticket for this with the buildbot team, here:
>> 
>> http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/3261#ticket <http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/3261#ticket>
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Jon
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Jon
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> cheers,
>>>> --renato
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jon Roelofs
>> jonathan at codesourcery.com <mailto:jonathan at codesourcery.com>
>> CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20150520/0b7314d2/attachment.html>