[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] LLVM IRC channel flooded?

[Matthias Braun]

+1 I completely agree with everything said in this thread. I wish I had a  “this error had nothing to do with the commits” link in the bot mails and if a certain amount of people clicked that link the bot would be stopped from sending mails or spamming the IRC channel…

I know setting up buildbots and keeping them running in a stable fashion is a hard task (I have done that for other projects) and we have to thank the people doing that ungrateful job, but wasting everyones time with too many false positives isn’t good either.

- Matthias

> On May 19, 2015, at 11:18 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> On 19 May 2015 at 18:39, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> NOC?
> 
> Sorry, NOC is "network operations centre". the room with big screens
> showing the status of a data centre, where operators sit and fix
> problems, always looking at the big screens on the wall, in case they
> go red.
> 
> 
>> What distinction are you drawing there? The difference between freshly red
>> and previously red?
> 
> Basically, yes.
> 
> 
>> What does this do differently from the main buildbot page? (other than only
>> show arm bots?) Is it something we could do to the buildbot page (remove
>> always-red builders, recategorize flaky/problematic builders so at least
>> they're off in the "experimental" section, etc)?
> 
> Separating ARM from the rest is the most important thing to me. but
> classifying them and only showing the information I want is also
> important.
> 
> James Knight has summarised well the problems I have with the current
> buildbot page.
> 
> cheers,
> --renato
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev