[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX vs -fopenmp and clang search library search path
clattner at apple.com
Fri May 15 21:35:08 PDT 2015
> On May 15, 2015, at 3:47 PM, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote:
> Adding a prefix may be desireable to avoid conflicts or confusion.
Sure, OTOH, we have precedent with this. There were many c++ standard libraries before libc++. I'm ok with LLVM's implementation being the defacto implementation, aren't you?
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>> On May 13, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Peyton, Jonathan L
>> <jonathan.l.peyton at intel.com> wrote:
>> We understand that iomp is undesirable. What we don’t know is what name is
>> What name is desirable instead of iomp? Do we want to link via…
>> -lnotintelomp ( just kidding J )
>> … Some other name? I get the feeling someone outside of Intel should make
>> this choice.
>> Why not -lomp?
>> Openmp-dev mailing list
>> Openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu
More information about the cfe-dev