[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX vs -fopenmp and clang search library search path
carlo.bertolli at gmail.com
Wed May 13 11:01:06 PDT 2015
I vote for -lllomp, i.e. lib name libllomp.a.
There is already a (perhaps unofficially named) LOMP library around (which
can be used as openmp runtime for clang) and this would make some
discussion hard to understand. See references to it here:
On 13 May 2015 at 12:34, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> My suggestion had been 'libllomp' which would be '-lllomp'. But I don't
> really care.
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:32 AM David Chisnall <
> David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> On 13 May 2015, at 17:29, Peyton, Jonathan L <jonathan.l.peyton at intel.com>
>> > What name is desirable instead of iomp? Do we want to link via…
>> > -lllvmomp
>> > -llvmomp
>> > -lclomp
>> > -lcomp
>> > -lnotintelomp ( just kidding J )
>> > … Some other name? I get the feeling someone outside of Intel should
>> make this choice.
>> [Joining in the bikeshed]
>> -llomp seems most consistent (first letter of LLVM + omp, consistent with
>> first letter of GNU + omp, first letter of Intel + omp).
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-dev