[cfe-dev] RFC: Nullability qualifiers
David Chisnall
David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk
Thu Jun 25 02:01:02 PDT 2015
On 24 Jun 2015, at 21:39, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:
>
> Another addendum: due to the conflict with glibc’s __nonnull, we’ll be renaming the __double_underscored keywords to _Big_underscored keywords, e.g.,
>
> __nonnull -> _Nonnull
> __nullable -> _Nullable
> __null_unspecified -> _Null_unspecified
Has anyone proposed these to WG14? They seem like they’d be good additions to the C standard and, if nothing else, it would be good to make sure that the next C standard doesn’t use the same spelling for something subtly different.
David
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list