[cfe-dev] Merging MinGW toolchain patches to 3.7

[Martell Malone]

>
> I've merged the requested changes in r243059, r243061, r243063, and
> r243064.

Great thanks Hans, I'll start testing the branch now :)


Any word on r242539  r242540 for compiler-rt ?


On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:

> I've merged the requested changes in r243059, r243061, r243063, and
> r243064.
>
> Please keep me posted if there are any follow-up commits with tests
> that should get merged.
>
> Thanks,
> Hans
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Richard Smith <metafoo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, we should get these changes into 3.7. I'll look over the patches
> >> later today.
> >
> > I'm not very happy about applying patches with no tests to the branch,
> but,
> > reluctantly, approved.
> >
> > Yaron: please add some tests for r242660 and r242667 to trunk. (I also
> find
> > it very weird that the MinGW::Arch member has a trailing slash. Is there
> a
> > good reason for that?)
> >>
> >> On 23 Jul 2015 9:56 am, "Hans Wennborg" <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +cfe-dev to keep it on the list, and Richard
> >>>
> >>> This sounds like a reasonable thing to merge.
> >>>
> >>> Richard, what's your opinion as an owner?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Martell Malone <
> martellmalone at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > I almost forgot
> >>> >
> >>> > Yaron also fixed all the different combination of linux host/distros
> >>> > targetting mingw with theses 3.
> >>> > I have a feeling we will have people hitting the mailing list about
> >>> > come the
> >>> > 3.7 release if their distro isn't working.
> >>> >
> >>> > clang
> >>> >
> >>> > r242660  Support mingw toolchain include and lib directories on Arch
> >>> > Linux.
> >>> > r242667  Remove erroneous space in "lib64" string constant.
> >>> > r242766  Fix mingw toolchain to honor sysroot on Linux and add tests.
> >>> >
> >>> > Again as i said I've no idea what the process is or what we can do
> >>> > here.
> >>> > Hoping you can fill me in on the details
> >>> >
> >>> > Kind Regards
> >>> > Martell
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Martell Malone
> >>> > <martellmalone at gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Hi Hans :)
> >>> >>
> >>> >> rnk and I were talking to me about the possibility of getting the
> >>> >> mingw
> >>> >> driver work back ported into the 3.7 branch.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I read the thread where you branched the 3.7 release you said that
> if
> >>> >> anyone has a request to have patches merged they should contact you
> >>> >> directly
> >>> >>
> >>> >> When the branch was made we were in the middle of crushing the final
> >>> >> bugs
> >>> >> in the MINGW Driver.
> >>> >> I had a total of about 9 patches merged but 2 missed the window
> >>> >> unfortunately.
> >>> >> 1 was for compiler-rt and 1 was for clang
> >>> >>
> >>> >> clang
> >>> >> r242905  Add support for -rtlib option and -stdlib option to the
> mingw
> >>> >> driver
> >>> >>
> >>> >> compiler-rt
> >>> >> r242539  compiler-rt: add support for mingw-w64 in builtins
> >>> >> r242540  Add missing chkstk.S files from r242539
> >>> >>
> >>> >> (r242540 is here because only half the patch was committed
> initially)
> >>> >>
> >>> >> These 2(now 3) patches complete my series and fixes everything to
> have
> >>> >> a
> >>> >> clang toolchain with mingw-w64 without needing gcc.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I don't know what the process is for back porting or how you feel
> >>> >> about
> >>> >> these patches but I said I would email you about it an see where we
> >>> >> can go
> >>> >> from here :)
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Kind Regards
> >>> >> Martell
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20150724/acd7128e/attachment.html>