[cfe-dev] Merging MinGW toolchain patches to 3.7

[Hans Wennborg]

+cfe-dev to keep it on the list, and Richard

This sounds like a reasonable thing to merge.

Richard, what's your opinion as an owner?


On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com> wrote:
> I almost forgot
>
> Yaron also fixed all the different combination of linux host/distros
> targetting mingw with theses 3.
> I have a feeling we will have people hitting the mailing list about come the
> 3.7 release if their distro isn't working.
>
> clang
>
> r242660  Support mingw toolchain include and lib directories on Arch Linux.
> r242667  Remove erroneous space in "lib64" string constant.
> r242766  Fix mingw toolchain to honor sysroot on Linux and add tests.
>
> Again as i said I've no idea what the process is or what we can do here.
> Hoping you can fill me in on the details
>
> Kind Regards
> Martell
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hans :)
>>
>> rnk and I were talking to me about the possibility of getting the mingw
>> driver work back ported into the 3.7 branch.
>>
>> I read the thread where you branched the 3.7 release you said that if
>> anyone has a request to have patches merged they should contact you directly
>>
>> When the branch was made we were in the middle of crushing the final bugs
>> in the MINGW Driver.
>> I had a total of about 9 patches merged but 2 missed the window
>> unfortunately.
>> 1 was for compiler-rt and 1 was for clang
>>
>> clang
>> r242905  Add support for -rtlib option and -stdlib option to the mingw
>> driver
>>
>> compiler-rt
>> r242539  compiler-rt: add support for mingw-w64 in builtins
>> r242540  Add missing chkstk.S files from r242539
>>
>> (r242540 is here because only half the patch was committed initially)
>>
>> These 2(now 3) patches complete my series and fixes everything to have a
>> clang toolchain with mingw-w64 without needing gcc.
>>
>> I don't know what the process is for back porting or how you feel about
>> these patches but I said I would email you about it an see where we can go
>> from here :)
>>
>> Kind Regards
>> Martell
>
>