[cfe-dev] Testing C++14 mode in libc++

[Eric Fiselier]

What compiler are you using?

>However, I can't help but think that they ought to be a way to systematically test this mode (without messing with lit.site.cfg) before shipping it off... to the buildbots...

see: http://libcxx.llvm.org/lit_usage.html

/Eric

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Larisse Voufo <lvoufo at google.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Larisse Voufo <lvoufo at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Looks like we have a buildbot that says things are fine over here:
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx14
>>>
>>> Thanks for the link, Dan. However, I can't help but think that they ought
>>> to be a way to systematically test this mode (without messing with
>>> lit.site.cfg) before shipping it off... to the buildbots...
>>> Am I to understand that the general practice here is to just rely on the
>>> buildbots?
>>
>>
>> Not what I meant to imply :) Just meant that it looks like they should be
>> passing.
>
>
> Ok. Didn't think that meant to. Just wanted to clarify. :)
>>>>
>>>> I think there was actually some discussion of this on IRC earlier today.
>>>> What little I saw made it sound like those were known failures if you're
>>>> using an older version if clang (such as the one that ships with xcode).
>>>
>>> This would be impossible in my case since I am working with llvm trunk...
>>
>>
>> Hmm. I just tested in my own tree, and I see them all pass just by
>> changing lit.site.cfg. I'm a little out of date though, r229176.
>
>
> Ok. Strange. Let me make sure I'm not doing anything "funky" then.
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>