[cfe-dev] [RFC] Should an illegal C++11 memory model in an atomic op be an error?
Tim Northover
tnorthover at apple.com
Mon Feb 2 13:27:55 PST 2015
Hi Sean,
> Tim, could you shed a bit more light on the context of this patch in rdar://problem/16242991 ?
There's not really any more context: the original bug was asking for some diagnostic, I decided it had to be a warning because legitimate C code can (statically) contain calls like that. It's most likely to come up with macro or template expansion of course.
Cheers.
Tim.
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list