[cfe-dev] Trying again - building 64bit code on Windows

[don hinton via cfe-dev]

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Edward Diener via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On 8/24/2015 6:05 PM, don hinton via cfe-dev wrote:
>
>> Just in case anyone else might want to know...
>>
>> I don't think this is a clang/llvm or boost issue.  It's more of a
>> cmake/ninja issue, and it works fine. (although I no longer use windows
>> and didn't try to test it).
>>
>> This should help:
>>
>>
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31262342/cmake-g-ninja-on-windows-specify-x64
>>
>
> I have already been told previously that the mingw(-64)/gcc toolchain used
> to build clang is independent of the mingw(-64)/gcc toolchain used as the
> RTL when clang itself is used to compile/link. Your link implies that I
> have to build clang using a 64-bit version of mingw-64/gcc in order to
> compile/link 64-bit code using clang. Is that true ?


Didn't mean to imply anything.  Hans's answer is best.


>
>
> >
>
>>
>> You could also look at the build bots -- they seem to build 64bit
>> windows without too much difficulty...
>>
>
> What are the "build bots" and how do I "look" at them ?
>

Continuous builds...

http://lab.llvm.org:8011

hth...
don


>
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Jonathan Roelofs via cfe-dev
>> <cfe-dev-NBbBogny7ofFcdTEL8lfRQ at public.gmane.org
>> <mailto:cfe-dev-NBbBogny7ofFcdTEL8lfRQ at public.gmane.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 8/24/15 3:36 PM, Edward Diener via cfe-dev wrote:
>>
>>         OTOH if I get the silent treatment again I will just assume that
>>         compiling 64-bit code with clang on a Microsoft Windows 64-bit OS
>> is
>>         not a reality and won't bother pursuing it further other than tell
>>         other interested Boost developers that it can't be done. Thanks !
>>
>>
>>     You shouldn't state things as fact that you don't know to be true.
>>     If you're going to say anything to the Boost devs w.r.t. this, be
>>     honest with them, and tell them that you don't know how to do it or
>>     whether it is even possible.  Nobody benefits from such
>> misinformation.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20150824/33d4ba6f/attachment.html>