[cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [lldb-dev] [3.7 Release] RC3 has been tagged, let's wrap this up

Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Sat Aug 22 16:13:17 PDT 2015


Still no complete go, doing the tests on i386 failed with some weird sed error:

[...]
Making Unit/lit.site.cfg for Clang extra tools...
sed: lit.tmp: No such file or directory
Makefile:61: recipe for target 'Unit/lit.site.cfg' failed
gmake[2]: *** [Unit/lit.site.cfg] Error 1

Strangely enough, this does not happen on amd64.  Maybe it is some sort of race condition?  Did anybody see this too?

Back to the investigation again... :(

-Dimitry

> On 22 Aug 2015, at 21:23, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> It's building with this patch now, already at Phase3, so it seems to work:
> 
> Index: trunk/utils/release/test-release.sh
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/utils/release/test-release.sh (revision 245679)
> +++ trunk/utils/release/test-release.sh (working copy)
> @@ -266,43 +268,36 @@
>     check_valid_urls
> 
>     for proj in $projects ; do
> -        if [ -d $proj.src ]; then
> -          echo "# Reusing $proj $Release-$RC sources"
> +        case $proj in
> +        llvm|openmp)
> +            projsrc=$proj.src
> +            ;;
> +        cfe)
> +            projsrc=llvm.src/tools/clang
> +            ;;
> +        clang-tools-extra)
> +            projsrc=llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra
> +            ;;
> +        compiler-rt|libcxx|libcxxabi|libunwind|test-suite)
> +            projsrc=llvm.src/projects/$proj
> +            ;;
> +        *)
> +            echo "error: unknown project $proj"
> +            exit 1
> +            ;;
> +        esac
> +
> +        if [ -d $projsrc ]; then
> +          echo "# Reusing $proj $Release-$RC sources in $projsrc"
>           continue
>         fi
> -        echo "# Exporting $proj $Release-$RC sources"
> -        if ! svn export -q $Base_url/$proj/$ExportBranch $proj.src ; then
> +        echo "# Exporting $proj $Release-$RC sources to $projsrc"
> +        if ! svn export -q $Base_url/$proj/$ExportBranch $projsrc ; then
>             echo "error: failed to export $proj project"
>             exit 1
>         fi
>     done
> 
> -    echo "# Creating symlinks"
> -    cd $BuildDir/llvm.src/tools
> -    if [ ! -h clang ]; then
> -        ln -s ../../cfe.src clang
> -    fi
> -    cd $BuildDir/cfe.src/tools
> -    if [ ! -h extra ]; then
> -        ln -s ../../clang-tools-extra.src extra
> -    fi
> -    cd $BuildDir/llvm.src/projects
> -    if [ -d $BuildDir/test-suite.src ] && [ ! -h test-suite ]; then
> -        ln -s ../../test-suite.src test-suite
> -    fi
> -    if [ -d $BuildDir/compiler-rt.src ] && [ ! -h compiler-rt ]; then
> -        ln -s ../../compiler-rt.src compiler-rt
> -    fi
> -    if [ -d $BuildDir/libcxx.src ] && [ ! -h libcxx ]; then
> -        ln -s ../../libcxx.src libcxx
> -    fi
> -    if [ -d $BuildDir/libcxxabi.src ] && [ ! -h libcxxabi ]; then
> -        ln -s ../../libcxxabi.src libcxxabi
> -    fi
> -    if [ -d $BuildDir/libunwind.src ] && [ ! -h libunwind ]; then
> -        ln -s ../../libunwind.src libunwind
> -    fi
> -
>     cd $BuildDir
> }
> 
> -Dimitry
> 
>> On 22 Aug 2015, at 18:54, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> 
>> The problem seems to be caused by the way the symlinks are setup in test-release.sh, e.g. like so:
>> 
>> llvm.src/tools/clang -> ../../cfe.src
>> cfe.src/tools/extra -> ../../clang-tools-extra.src
>> 
>> When it then tries to access the path llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../../../include, it fails.  I tried this on both FreeBSD, OSX and Linux, but it fails everywhere.
>> 
>> For example, on Linux:
>> 
>> $ ls -l ~/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 dim dim 13 2015-08-22 18:40:16 /home/dim/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang -> ../../cfe.src/
>> $ ls -l ~/foo/cfe.src/tools/extra
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 dim dim 27 2015-08-22 18:53:04 /home/dim/foo/cfe.src/tools/extra -> ../../clang-tools-extra.src/
>> $ ls -l ~/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling
>> total 16
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 dim dim 8983 2015-08-22 18:17:18 ApplyReplacements.cpp
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 dim dim  526 2015-08-22 18:17:18 Makefile
>> $ ls -l ~/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../../../include
>> ls: cannot access /home/dim/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../../../include: No such file or directory
>> 
>> Note that llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../.. goes back to the top level, where *.src is checked out:
>> 
>> $ ls -l ~/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../..
>> total 12
>> drwxr-xr-x 16 dim dim 4096 2015-08-22 18:17:16 cfe.src/
>> drwxr-xr-x 14 dim dim 4096 2015-08-22 18:40:32 clang-tools-extra.src/
>> drwxr-xr-x 16 dim dim 4096 2015-08-22 18:13:58 llvm.src/
>> 
>> Of course at a level even below that, there is little chance of an include directory existing.  How does anybody else manage to build using the test-release.sh script, and having clang-tools-extra?
>> 
>> -Dimitry
>> 
>>> On 21 Aug 2015, at 14:09, Dimitry Andric via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Strangely, the clang-tools-extra stuff does build if I manually check it out like so (without any symlinks):
>>> 
>>> .                        <-- https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37
>>> tools/clang              <-- https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_37
>>> tools/clang/tools/extra  <-- https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/branches/release_37
>>> 
>>> I'll investigate, because it would be nice to have those tools.
>>> 
>>> -Dimitry
>>> 
>>>> On 21 Aug 2015, at 13:42, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Dmitry, if I understood Hans clang-extra wasn't part of the build prior to rc3. Just delete it and run script with --no-checkout.
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote:
>>>> Hm, it does not seem to compile at all here?  The build ends with:
>>>> 
>>>> In file included from /home/dim/llvm-3.7.0/rc3/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/ApplyReplacements.cpp:17:
>>>> /home/dim/llvm-3.7.0/rc3/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../include/clang-apply-replacements/Tooling/ApplyReplacements.h:19:10: fatal error: 'clang/Tooling/Refactoring.h' file not found
>>>> #include "clang/Tooling/Refactoring.h"
>>>>       ^
>>>> 1 error generated.
>>>> 
>>>> Any idea?  I had no problems at all with -rc2.
>>>> 
>>>> -Dimitry
>>>> 
>>>>> On 21 Aug 2015, at 02:51, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>> 
>>>>> 3.7-rc3 has just been tagged. Testers, please test, build binaries,
>>>>> upload to the sftp and report results to this thread.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Again, a lot of patches got merged between rc2 and rc3, but hopefully
>>>>> nothing that should upset things.
>>>>> 
>>>>> One thing that did change is that the release script now correctly
>>>>> symlinks clang-tools-extra into the build. If this causes problems on
>>>>> your platform, please just remove it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is a release candidate in the real sense: at this point I have
>>>>> zero release blockers on my radar. I will now only accept fixes for
>>>>> critical regressions, and if nothing comes up, rc3 will be promoted to
>>>>> 3.7.0-final.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Documentation and release note patches are still welcome all the way
>>>>> up until the final tag goes in.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Issues that were on my radar, but I don't consider blocking:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Sanitizer test failures on various platforms, e.g. PR24222. We never
>>>>> ran these tests in previous releases, so it's not a regression. It
>>>>> would be great if the sanitizer folks could look into the test
>>>>> failures, but it's not blocking 3.7.
>>>>> 
>>>>> - PR24273: "[ARM] Libc++abi built in-tree with libunwind fails in
>>>>> __cxa_allocate_exception", Renato will exclude libc++ from his build
>>>>> for now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Lack of key functions in some Instruction classes causing build
>>>>> failures without -fno-rtti
>>>>> (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089010.html). No
>>>>> patches have been forthcoming, so this will not get fixed for 3.7. At
>>>>> least we correctly report -fno-rtti in llvm-config built with CMake
>>>>> now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> - r244221: "[SPARC] Don't compare arch name as a string, use the enum
>>>>> instead", owner is unresponsive.
>>>>> 
>>>>> - "[lldb] r245020 - [MIPS]Handle floating point and aggregate return
>>>>> types in SysV-mips [32 bit] ABI", owner is unresponsive.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Hans
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20150823/b803fc94/attachment.sig>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list