[cfe-dev] [libcxx] Policy with respect to language extensions

[Gonzalo BG via cfe-dev]

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote:

> In my opinion the less switches libc++ has the better.
>

I agree.

> In the coming week I'll be trying to document all of the current libc++
extensions.

First, thanks for taking on this! Knowing which extensions there are would
already be very helpful.

For me it would be particularly interesting to know which extensions have
been proposed
for standardization (and in which paper). Howard and you mentioned that the
"return {...}; into a std::tuple"
extension made it into the standard draft. I think this is a great example
of how a libc++ extension
has resulted in a benefit for the many.

Bests,
Gonzalo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20150819/6c1b1ffd/attachment.html>