[cfe-dev] Clang-format Sublime Text Plugin

[Daniel Jasper]

Sure, but I have briefly looked at the source code of the other plugin and
they seem to be able to cope without a big table of encodings. Either they
aren't having this problem yet, or they have a better way to solve it. I'd
like to find out which (and I don't know much about sublime myself). Could
you also send your change as a diff against the SVN version? Makes it much
easier to see what you actually changed.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Neumann, Adrian <adrian.neumann at siemens.com
> wrote:

> I agree that having two diverging plugins is not optimal. I will try to
> contact the author of the other plugin. I think however that it would make
> sense to fix the encoding problem in the svn version of the llvm plugin
> until
> this is resolved.
>
> > If it doesn't work for ST2, why not? Can we make it compatible? How is it
> > handling the encoding problems you are
> > having? Lets try not to maintain two distinct plugins and if we have to,
> > lets at least try to keep them in sync.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20150811/195220a7/attachment.html>