[cfe-dev] Latest clang from source breaks clang on Windows targeting gcc linking
Edward Diener
eldlistmailingz at tropicsoft.com
Sat Aug 8 12:37:35 PDT 2015
On 8/8/2015 1:59 PM, Yaron Keren wrote:
> I'm looking into this, see https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24395
> The solution is somewhat more compilcated but you can use the patch
> there for now.
The patch solved the general problem I illustrated below. Thanks !
But for the example in my other posts, where an exception was being
thrown from a module using as a type a class that is in another DLL that
is being exported/imported, the attempt to link to that DLL now fails with:
ex_exception.obj: In function `ex_exception':
ex_exception.cpp:42: undefined reference to `_Unwind_Resume'
ex_xml_exception.obj: In function `ex_xml_exception':
ex_xml_exception.cpp:32: undefined reference to `_Unwind_Resume'
ex_xml_exception.cpp:39: undefined reference to `_Unwind_Resume'
ex_xml_exception.cpp:42: undefined reference to `_Unwind_Resume'
clang++.exe: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to
see invocation)
These error messages are exactly the same whether or not I attempt to
export/import the individual member functions of a visible class or
whether I attempt to export/import the class as a whole. At least the
previous error messages which occurred in the above situation have
disappeared <g>.
If you need for me to repeat the ex_exception, ex_xml_exception, and
throw_exception_ex source, with their command lines, in this post I will
be glad to do it.
Searching the web for "undefined reference to `_Unwind_Resume'" yields
various possibilities but none are definitive for this case AFAICS.
>
> 2015-08-08 20:20 GMT+03:00 Edward Diener
> <eldlistmailingz-5p0dqD/c5LGWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org
> <mailto:eldlistmailingz-5p0dqD/c5LGWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org>>:
>
> Some change in the latest source has completely broken linking for
> clang on Windows targeting gcc.
>
> // ex_aclass.hpp
>
> #ifndef EX_ACLASS_HPP
> #define EX_ACLASS_HPP
> #if defined(BLD_EX_EXAMPLE)
> #define EX_DECL __attribute__((__dllexport__))
> #else
> #define EX_DECL __attribute__((__dllimport__))
> #endif
> class EX_DECL ex_aclass
> {
> public:
> int a_function(long);
> };
> #endif // EX_ACLASS_HPP
>
> // ex_aclass.cpp
>
> #define BLD_EX_EXAMPLE
> #include "ex_aclass.hpp"
> int ex_aclass::a_function(long amt)
> {
> return(amt > 1000000 ? 10 : 20);
> }
>
> // Compile ex_aclass.cpp
>
> clang++.exe -c -x c++ -D__MINGW_FORCE_SYS_INTRINS -O0 -g -fno-inline
> -Wall -g -march=i686 -m32 -o "ex_aclass.obj" "ex_aclass.cpp"
>
> // Link into ex_ac.dll
>
> clang++.exe" -o "ex_ac.dll" -Wl,-soname -Wl,ex_ac.dll -shared
> -Wl,--start-group "ex_aclass.obj" -Wl,-Bstatic -Wl,-Bdynamic
> -Wl,--end-group -g -march=i686 -m32
>
> libmingw32.a(lib32_libmingw32_a-pseudo-reloc.o):pseudo-reloc.c:(.text+0x1d6):
> undefined reference to `__chkstk_ms'
> clang++.exe: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v
> to see invocation)
>
> Nor does it matter what source file is used in general, whenever the
> link is done for anything the "undefined reference to `__chkstk_ms'"
> occurs.
>
> Can some one of the clang developers please look at this ?
>
> I am using clang on Windows with the 32-bit version of
> mingw-64/gcc-5.1 as i686-5.1.0-posix-dwarf-rt_v4-rev0.
>
> I realize the current problems for clang on Windows targeting gcc
> may have occurred trying to fix a more specific problem I reported
> in two other threads about linkage failure using dllexport and
> dllimport attributes on Windows, but going from a situation where a
> specific problem broke the linking to all situations are broken when
> attempting to link is not good.
>
> I tried looking at the clang unit tests and how they can be run on
> Windows but found very little information about both. I wouldn't
> mind contributing some basic unit tests, even though I am not a
> clang developer, just to make sure that clang on Windows targeting
> gcc will work when compiling/linking dlls and using those dlls from
> another module, if I could understand what to do. That way such a
> snafu as this latest breakage would not occur so easily as whatever
> broke in the change should have been caught by some unit tests.
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> <mailto:cfe-dev-NBbBogny7ofFcdTEL8lfRQ at public.gmane.org>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list