[cfe-dev] [libc++] Porting libc++ to Windows

Jonathan Roelofs jonathan at codesourcery.com
Wed Aug 5 13:40:31 PDT 2015



On 8/5/15 2:29 PM, Eric Fiselier wrote:
> I would prefer phabricator simply because it will get lost on my TODO
> list otherwise. To use phabricator I just run "git diff master" and
> upload that diff to phabricator (assuming your branch in up to date
> with the HEAD of master).

`git diff master -U999` is preferred to make reviews easier.


Jon

>
> /Eric
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Fulvio Esposito <fulvio.esposito at live.it> wrote:
>> I was using GitHub just because I’ve never used Phabricator. If you can give
>> me some pointers I’ll switch to that. I will also squashing the commits.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Fulvio
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: David Chisnall
>> Sent: 05 August 2015 20:50
>> To: Fulvio Esposito
>> Cc: clang developer list
>> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [libc++] Porting libc++ to Windows
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Fulvio,
>>
>> I’m happy to do code review on GitHub if that’s easier for you than
>> Phabricator, but would you mind creating a branch that is rebased on head
>> and has all of the commits squashed, so that I can see a single commit as a
>> diff against head?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>

-- 
Jon Roelofs
jonathan at codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded



More information about the cfe-dev mailing list