[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] [RFC] OpenMP offload infrastructure (iteration 2)
Alexandre Eichenberger
alexe at us.ibm.com
Wed Apr 29 11:28:53 PDT 2015
Just a head up, but it looks like OpenMP 4.1 will go away of the map of the
pointer as well as the pointee in maps...Since this is going away, we may
want to revisit the interface with this respect. It has not been voted in
yet, but we should know more in 2-3 weeks
Alexandre
From: Samuel F Antao/Watson/IBM at IBMUS
To: Sergey Ostanevich <sergos.gnu at gmail.com>
Cc: openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu, Clang Developers
List <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu"
<llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
Date: 04/29/2015 02:19 PM
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] [RFC] OpenMP offload infrastructure
(iteration 2)
Sent by: cfe-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
Hi Sergey,
Thanks for putting the new version of the document together! I don't see
any other issues. I strongly believe the approach described in the document
is a nice way to get OpenMP offloading support in clang. I plan to start
actively contributing code for this component of the OpenMP implementation
soon.
Thanks again,
Samuel
2015-04-29 11:47 GMT-04:00 Sergey Ostanevich <sergos.gnu at gmail.com>:
Hi!
Here's an updated version - couple of misprints are fixed. Thank you
to Roel Jordans and Kelvin Li for pointing this out.
I put this on Google drive to avoid the mailing list restrictions,
feel free to complain on the accessibility issues.
http://goo.gl/L1rnKJ
Oh, and please - provide your positive feedback, if you don't see any
mistakes to be fixed. :)
Regards,
Sergey Ostanevich
Open Source Compilers
Intel Corporation
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Sergey Ostanevich <sergos.gnu at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> To continue the original
> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/75674)
> discussion of offload infrastructure I have an updated document with
> more details for your attention.
> The document is a consensus of the contributors representing a number
> of institutions: ANL, AMD,
> IBM, Intel and Texas Instruments.
>
> Our intent is to have a discussion and an approval from the community
> on the method we are going
> to implement, so when the time to submit patches will come there will
> be no surprises.
>
> Thank you,
> Sergey Ostanevich
> Open Source Compilers
> Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Openmp-dev mailing list
Openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list