[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] RFC: LLVM should require a working C++11 <thread>, <mutex>, and <atomic>

[Yaron Keren]

Nikola, there is a patch for this, see  http://reviews.llvm.org/D5268


2014-09-25 0:56 GMT+03:00 Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>:

>
>> I'll probably open a bug on this, but I just tried using clang.exe 3.5.0
>> built with either MSVC or MinGW-w64-win32threads. When built with
>> MinGW-w64,
>> clang.exe is too promiscuous in terms of where it picks up system headers.
>> It found a set of mingw.org headers installed elsewhere on my system
>> (definitely not on my path) which it proceeded to error on:
>>
>>
> I think we already have a bug http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18546.
> Clang driver never had proper support for MinGW.
>
>
>
>> So, would love if clang could be a more self-sufficient toolchain and stop
>> picking up headers from strange places that just happened to be sitting on
>> my hard drive in the default install location, since those headers were
>> not
>> used to build clang at all.
>>
>>
> I was under the impression that we were trying to move a away from this
> "clang picks up headers from the toolchain it was built with" logic?
> Clang's default triple is determined at configure time which is a bit
> unfortunate. I think most people would agree that msvc compatible triple
> should be the default for windows version of clang.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140925/00d16341/attachment.html>