[cfe-dev] clang-format: Proposal for a new style for constructor and initializers line break.
Daniel Jasper
djasper at google.com
Sun Sep 14 02:34:09 PDT 2014
Not entirely sure what advise you are looking for.
My thoughts:
- I am happy to accept a patch provided is has sufficient unit tests
- I think this should go in as a single patch, I don't see a need for "a
set of small patches"
- Personally, I think this style is bad as it makes it harder to
distinguish wrapped constructor arguments from initializers
- In particular, how do you indent:
Constructor( // Arguments too long to fit on the same line
SomeArgument some_argument,
SomeOtherArgument some_other_argument) :
some_argument_(some_argument),
some_other_argument_(some_other_argument) {
}
Is this style used in any large project or widely used style guide?
Cheers,
Daniel
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Jean-philippe Dufraigne <
j.dufraigne at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm interested in adding support for another style for constructor colon
> and initializer.
> An example of the style is above the value BCIS_AfterColonAndComma bellow.
>
> BreakConstructorInitializers would replace 'bool
> BreakConstructorInitializersBeforeComma;' while maintaining backward
> compatibility, in a similar fashion it was done before.
>
> I have the prototype for the code and would be really happy to finalize it
> and contribute a set of small patches.
>
> Please let me know if this something that fits with the project and if you
> have any advice.
> Best Regards,
> Jean-Philippe
>
> /// \brief Different ways to break initializers.
> enum BreakConstructorInitializersStyle
> {
> /// Constructor()
> /// : initializer1(),
> /// initializer2()
> BCIS_BeforeColonAfterComma,
> /// Constructor()
> /// : initializer1()
> /// , initializer2()
> BCIS_BeforeColonAndComma,
> /// Constructor() :
> /// initializer1(),
> /// initializer2()
> BCIS_AfterColonAndComma
> };
>
> /// \brief Breaking and alignment style for constructor initializers
> BreakConstructorInitializersStyle BreakConstructorInitializers;
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140914/c0c7e10a/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list