[cfe-dev] Applying custom filters after preprocessing (and compile-time sprintf optimization)
Richard Smith
richard at metafoo.co.uk
Thu Oct 2 19:41:02 PDT 2014
On 2 Oct 2014 18:56, "Kazuho Oku" <kazuhooku at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 2014-10-03 9:31 GMT+09:00 Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Recently I have started writing a preprocessor that wraps the C
preprocessor for optimizing calls to sprintf, since it is the one of the
bottlenecks of my application.
>>> https://github.com/kazuho/qrintf
>>>
>>> For GCC, it was easy for me to override the default C preprocessor, by
using its `-no-integrated-cpp` and `-wrapper` options (how I have done it
can be found in the `qrinf-gcc` and `qrintf-gcc-wrapper` files included in
the above repository).
>>>
>>> However I have so far been unable to find a similar command-line option
for Clang. Is there any way to post-process the output of the preprocessor
in Clang? Or do I need to modify the source code of Clang itself?
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>
>>> PS. BTW it would be great if compile-time optimization of sprintf goes
into Clang. Is there any chance of such possibility?
>>
>>
>> In the general case, it's not possible to optimize sprintf fully,
because its behavior depends on the current locale (this affects %d and %u,
which it looks like you optimize) and it might have libc-specific
extensions, but LLVM does optimize in some simple cases: for instance, a
sprintf containing no % is optimized into memcpy. I expect patches would be
accepted to implement further cases, such as handling %s and %c.
>
>
> Thank you for the response. I am delighted to hear that.
>
> I had thought that %d and %u weren't affected by the locale (since the
digits 0..9 and non-monetary use of positive/negative signs are IMO not
locale-dependent).
Sorry, yes, I think you're right: they aren't affected by locale by
default, only if you use the ' or I flags.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20141002/194cc314/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list