[cfe-dev] Clang 3.5 Release Pre-Pre-Pre-Announcement

Hans Wennborg hans at chromium.org
Fri May 16 14:24:36 PDT 2014


On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
>
> In article <53765DB4.8040009 at nuanti.com>,
>     Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> writes:
>
>>
>> On 16/05/2014 21:20, Richard wrote:
>> > I have some packaging changes I'd like to see in place for the 3.5
>> > packaging. [...]
>>
>> So far the idea with the Windows installer has been to provide a
>> toolchain rather than a complete SDK, but it'd be nice to see if we can
>> head in that direction, perhaps with a separate SDK package.
>
> Yes, this was stated before.
>
> However, it makes no sense to me.
>
> Why are we denying Windows users of the clang package libraries and
> headers that we supply to the users on other platforms?
>
> I see no reason for the platform disparity.
>> CC'ing in Hans who has opinions on this.
>
> This message didn't have any cc: header on it when I got it... FYI.
>
>> Which files did you want to include specifically?
>
> See <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19223>.
>
> Libraries and headers for using the refactoring tool library code are
> present in the unix distributions but not present in the Windows
> distributions.
>
> For this particular situation, the problem isn't that the build needs
> a patch, it's that you need to stop setting
> LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY=ON on the machine where you package up the
> Windows package.

OK, maybe we should try shipping without LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY.
It grows the installer from 25 MB to 115 MB, but Reid pointed out that
the release on Linux is actually even larger, so maybe it's ok.

If we think this is what we want to do, I can build next week's
snapshot this way, and maybe Richard can try it out and see if
building a tool with that works?

Thanks,
Hans



More information about the cfe-dev mailing list