[cfe-dev] Question about __asan_set_error_report_callback

[Oliver Schneider]

Hi Yury,

On 2014-03-26 16:27, Yury Gribov wrote:
> FYI continuing execution after first error was rather successful here
> (we applied some local patches to GCC).
> 
> We have a rather big app (rebuild takes hours) and forcing QA team to
> attack errors one-by-one would be tremendously inefficient.
In our case we use fork() to let the child die and catch the condition
in the parent, so that the processing continues on other files when
something bad happens. It means that from the point on where fork()
would be called, the memory would be untainted. But your mileage may vary.

// Oliver

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140326/c421a24d/attachment.sig>