[cfe-dev] RFC: Adding a rename refactoring tool to clang

[Amin Shali]

Thank you Richard. I am glad to see that there is already an effort on
testing refactoring logic. We will look into this and use it.



*Λ*MIN シ | Data, that's what for dinner. | amshali@
<amshali at google.com> | Google
Inc.


On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:

>
> In article <CAGCO0Kh=
> usFmr1_Uak7d8wNAaPuHnC_kxHQbdy7oXhojDSeGyg at mail.gmail.com>,
>     Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes:
>
> > FWIW, I have long argued that we should busy-box all of our tools that
> pull
> > in the full Clang parser, semantic analyzer, and AST. I think only
> > clang-format really makes sense as a separate tool...
>
> For the refactoring tools, I think this makes sense, i.e.
>
> clang-refactor rename ....
> clang-refactor modernize ...
>
> etc.
>
> What other tools are there besides refactoring tools and clang-format?
> --
> "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <
> http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
>      The Computer Graphics Museum <http://ComputerGraphicsMuseum.org>
>          The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
>   Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://LegalizeAdulthood.wordpress.com>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140728/e0975131/attachment.html>