[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] RFC: Do we still need @llvm.convert.to.fp16 and the reverse?

[Renato Golin]

On 14 July 2014 21:37, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> Looks like we need to be very careful here and not to change
> storage-only semantics. Besides this I'm ok with dropping them.

If that's similar to named registers (@llvm.read_register and
@llvm.write_register), than staying as intrinsics is a good choice for
that very reason.

--renato