[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] Status of SEH?

[Jb Feldman]

I would like to say, in Alp's defense, that I definitely felt like it was
more than just a polite request not to discuss something on the list. Being
told to "talk to my lawyer" was not particularly constructive. I appreciate
that Chandler was trying to keep the discussion from going any farther, but
I also appreciate that Alp was trying to stick up for me and turn it into
positive changes for the list and policy documentation. I would also like
to mention that until today, I had not read the page that Alp linked to:
http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html. I would suggest putting a link
to that on the first page of http://clang.llvm.org/get_involved.html so
that when people sign up for the list, they know what is expected of them,
which is something I've still had a hard time figuring out.

Thanks,
JB


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote:

> Alp,
>
> On Jan 30, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote:
>
> What next, turn people away because they have a funny name? Reject patches
> because their skin color is different to yours? I'm disappointed that
> you've tried to defend what is clearly repeated and inexcusable behaviour
> by Chandler towards people who are graciously trying to help out. In so far
> as there is a community, we must stand up distance ourselves from behaviour
> like that.
>
>
> I don't have an opinion in this discussion, but this form of personal
> attack should be acceptable on the LLVM mailing lists.  Please settle your
> disagreements with each other civilly.
>
> --Owen
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140130/061e37b4/attachment.html>