[cfe-dev] Adding a new pragma to Clang

[Hal Finkel]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Philip Reames" <listmail at philipreames.com>
> To: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 11:30:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Adding a new pragma to Clang
> 
> On 1/8/14 9:16 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
> > This is interesting. We can add the attributes in "beta" stage, and
> > change to closer to whatever OMP comes up, just to make things
> > easier
> > to users. Since this attribute is going to be only used by a
> > handful
> > of people for now, mostly us and tests, I think it should be ok.
> Since it sounds like the initial use is for internal testing and
> "bleeding edge" users, I'd suggest naming these in ways which clearly
> denote their experimental (and likely to change) status. (e.g.
> "__clang_experimental_unroll" rather than "unroll".)  Once we're
> happy
> with the usage model, we can come back to the bikeshed discussion
> about
> naming.

+1

 -Hal

> 
> Philip
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
> 

-- 
Hal Finkel
Assistant Computational Scientist
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory