[cfe-dev] MSVC RTTI implementation status

[Dennis Luehring]

thats great thank you so much

Am 01.03.2014 02:18, schrieb Reid Kleckner:
> So, it took me a while, but I wrote some docs on Clang compatibility with
> MSVC:
> http://clang.llvm.org/docs/MSVCCompatibility.html
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz at gmx.net> wrote:
>
> > I don't think it would be unreasonable
> >> for us to maintain a list of things
> >> we do and do not claim to support.
> >>
> >
> > that would be perfect
> >
> > a very simple page (maybe a clang llvm.org subpage, or something like a
> > single wikipage somewhere so others can extend)
> > with information about what would bee needed for full 100% MSVC
> > compatibility
> > like super tiny sections about ABI, RTTI, SEH(64), PDB, etc. with
> > information behind what is the current state (maybe the silly percent,
> > beginning, nearly-ready, done..., ignored, etc.)
> >
> > would be absolutely great to make other people understand whats still
> > missing to just work out of
> > the box and to reduce frustrating tryouts with no success/chance to work
> >
> >
> > Am 24.02.2014 07:53, schrieb David Majnemer:
> >
> >  Among all those I know of working on the MS ABI compatibility, none have
> >> made RTTI an immediate priority.  Personally, I've made progress
> >> understanding some of the subtleties of the format. However, I've put this
> >> work on my back-burner because it requires changes to LLVM IR itself.
> >>
> >> In general, ABI compatibility is most easily achieved when IR constructs
> >> are able to already represent ABI constructs.
> >>
> >> I don't think it would be unreasonable for us to maintain a list of things
> >> we do and do not claim to support.
> >>
> >> On Sat Feb 22 2014 at 11:42:59 PM, Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz at gmx.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > would be great to have an place for related information to keep track of
> >> > the progress
> >> >
> >> > ABI
> >> > (PDB-Support?)
> >> > etc.
> >> >
> >> > Am 23.02.2014 03:10, schrieb Kim:
> >> > > Hello,
> >> > >
> >> > > I'd just like to inquire about the status of the MSVC compatible RTTI
> >> > > implementation, when it might be complete and how I can keep track of
> >> > > progress on this feature.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks very much,
> >> > > Kim
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > cfe-dev mailing list
> >> > > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > cfe-dev mailing list
> >> > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-dev mailing list
> > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
> >
>