[cfe-dev] SourceManger::getBufferData <<INVALID SOURCE LOCATION>>
Richard Smith
richard at metafoo.co.uk
Fri Feb 28 14:12:49 PST 2014
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Adam T. Moody <moody20 at llnl.gov> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I want to reiterate these questions, since it seems they were missed the
> first time. I'd appreciate any help.
>
>
> I'm working with clang version 3.5 (trunk 198970) to create a tool to
> rewrite some source files. I have two questions:
>
> 1) Comments for the getEditBuffer method of the Rewriter class suggest
> that it will return the current edit buffer for a file or create and return
> a new buffer if it doesn't already exist. In the case where no insert /
> replace calls have been made, I had hoped this method would return the
> original source, but this doesn't seem to work for me. What is the
> recommended way to get a buffer containing the original source when no
> changes have been made to it?
>
>
> 2) When I have not modified the original source, I get a string like
> "<<<<<INVALID SOURCE LOCATION>>>>>", and in some of those cases, my tool
> seg faults. I wonder if there is a bug in SourceManager::getBufferData. The
> aforementioned string is hardcoded in the function (allocated on the
> stack), and it is used to initialize a StringRef object for the return
> value. Is the returned StringRef object then referencing a portion of
> memory that has been popped from the stack?
>
No; string literal objects have static storage duration.
> Thanks,
> -Adam
>
>
>
> Moody, Adam T. wrote:
>
> Hello Clang team,
>>
>> I'm working with clang version 3.5 (trunk 198970) to create a tool to
>> rewrite some source files. I have two questions:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1) Comments for the getEditBuffer method of the Rewriter class suggest
>> that it will return the current edit buffer for a file or create and return
>> a new buffer if it doesn't already exist. In the case, where no insert /
>> replace calls have been made, I had hoped this method would return the
>> original source, but this doesn't seem to work for me. What is the
>> recommended way to get a buffer containing the original source when no
>> changes have been made to it?
>>
>>
>>
>> 2) When I have not modified the original source, I get a string like
>> "<<<<<INVALID SOURCE LOCATION>>>>>", and in some of those cases, my tool
>> seg faults. I wonder if there is a bug in SourceManager::getBufferData.
>> The aforementioned string is hardcoded in the function (allocated on the
>> stack), and it is used to initialize a StringRef object for the return
>> value. Is the returned StringRef object then referencing a portion of
>> memory that has been popped from the stack?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for any insight,
>>
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140228/ecb29f5f/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list