[cfe-dev] changing -save-temps to keep bitcode?
David Blaikie
dblaikie at gmail.com
Mon Dec 15 15:06:33 PST 2014
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 15, 2014 5:23 PM, "David Blaikie" <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/15/14 15:10, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:26:43AM -0800, Bob Wilson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Does anyone have interest in this or objections to it?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yes, please. Especially if it captures the bitcode *before* any of the
> >>> optimisations hit.
> >>
> >>
> >> Agreed. On several occasions, I've found myself wondering how I can
> generate bitcode exactly as it leaves the parser, before any early cleanups
> and such.
> >
> >
> > -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns
> >
> > will produce the IR straight out of Clang's CodeGen. Skipping things
> like the AlwaysInliner and AddDiscriminator pass, etc.
> >
>
> Yes. Of course, i know that.
>
Ah, sorry - wasn't sure if you knew that particular one. I always forget
it/have to look it up whenever I want to do that.
> The point is that easier is better.
>
Sure enough - well, point to Bob, then: consider doing this kind of IR,
rather than the usual -emit-llvm IR, to get something closer to the
original/pure generated IR.
- David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20141215/fe95093a/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list