[cfe-dev] implicit int rule for c89

[James Dennett]

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Rong, Hongbo <hongbo.rong at intel.com>
wrote:
>
>  b.c:
>
> int main() {
>
>   a = 1;
>
>   return a;
>
> }
>
>
>
> clang.exe -std=c89 b.c
>
> b.c:2:3: error: use of undeclared identifier 'a'
>
>   a = 1;
>
>   ^
>
> b.c:3:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'a'
>
>   return a;
>
>          ^
>
> 2 errors generated.
>
>
>
> For c89, why variable a is not made as an implicit int?
>
>
>
Because that's not what C89 says.  "implicit int" was for functions, not
variables.

-- James
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20141214/437e364f/attachment.html>