[cfe-dev] libclang locking files for write/delete on windows
Ivan Koster
ivankoster at gmail.com
Wed Dec 10 13:45:23 PST 2014
From
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366537(v=vs.85).aspx
>
> Mapped views of a file mapping object maintain internal references to the
> object, and a file mapping object does not close until all references to it
> are released. Therefore, to fully close a file mapping object, an
> application must unmap all mapped views of the file mapping object by
> calling *UnmapViewOfFile*
> <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366882(v=vs.85).aspx> and
> close the file mapping object handle by calling *CloseHandle*
> <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724211(v=vs.85).aspx>.
> These functions can be called in any order.
Since CloseHandle is already called after the init, it seems the mapped
view is still open?
I'm a C and python programmer and (no C++ experience at all) have an
incredible hard time reading the code.
Nevertheless, Mapping in mapped_file_region seems to be the only view
created and it is unmapped in the destructor:
mapped_file_region::~mapped_file_region() {
> if (Mapping)
> ::UnmapViewOfFile(Mapping);
> }
Can I conclude that the destructor is not called?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Kim Gräsman <kim.grasman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Reid,
>
> Yep; from Path.inc/mapped_region::init:
>
> // Close all the handles except for the view. It will keep the other
> handles
> // alive.
> ::CloseHandle(FileMappingHandle);
> if (FileDescriptor) {
> if (CloseFD)
> _close(FileDescriptor); // Also closes FileHandle.
> } else
> ::CloseHandle(FileHandle);
> return std::error_code();
>
> But as far as I can reason about it, the mapping is unmapped in
> ~mapped_region. Maybe the MemoryBuffer backed by the mapping is cached
> somewhere and lives on?
>
> - Kim
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> > Can the memory mapping outlive the file handle? I bet it can.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Ivan Koster <ivankoster at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Ivan,
> >>
> >>
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >>> This is good info; MemoryBuffer::getOpenFile conditionally uses file
> >>> mappings or normal file reads depending on file size (see
> >>> MemoryBuffer.cpp/shouldUseMmap).
> >>>
> >>> Since the mapping uses a stricter sharing mode than the normal file
> >>> read, it's more likely to fail. Still not sure who's writing/deleting
> >>> the file while Clang attempts to map it, can you make that out from
> >>> your PM logs?
> >>
> >>
> >> I've exported the log to csv and you can find it here:
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8xFlIzMhHcpdzR6OW4wM3BZdGM/view?usp=sharing
> >>
> >> This is a log of sublime text opening dummy.c, commanding YCMD
> >> (python.exe) to analyze the dummy.c, which so and so on then finally
> makes
> >> libclang.dll open dummy.h, and finally me killing the python.exe
> process.
> >> As you can see, killing the proces does not log anything, even though it
> >> "frees" the file.
> >>
> >> The trace shows two threads of libclang.dll (TID 6888 and TID 4040), but
> >> they do not operate concurrently. 4040 only starts after 6888 is done
> with
> >> dummy.h.
> >> When I examine the stack traces of the CreateFileMapping operation that
> >> appears in pairs, they both happen in the same kernel32.dll
> >> CreateFileMappingA function.
> >> So the kernel seems to work around the FILE LOCKED WITH ONLY HEADERS
> thing
> >> here?
> >>
> >> There are no dangling file handles, the trace shows only pairs of open
> and
> >> close events. This is confirmed by the windows handle.exe tool, which
> can
> >> not find any filehandles to dummy.h even though the file is locked.
> >> The weird thing is that the windows Process Explorer has a "find file
> >> handle or DLL" function.
> >> When I make it search for dummy.h, it finds not a file handle, but a DLL
> >> inside python.exe called dummy.h.
> >> Somehow Process Explorer reports that dummy.h is loaded as a DLL? (When
> I
> >> kill python.exe this disappears).
> >>
> >> I haven't dived so deep into windows stuff before so I'm hoping this
> >> helps!
> >> But to be honest, this is starting to not make sense to me. The file is
> >> locked even though there is no open file handle. Process Explorer
> reporting
> >> that it is loaded as a DLL...
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Ivan
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20141210/ab1cc19a/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list