[cfe-dev] Use of Smart Pointers in LLVM Projects

David Blaikie dblaikie at gmail.com
Sun Aug 10 13:07:57 PDT 2014

Thanks for the input, guys - I've recommitted the ASTConsumers patches
in (clang: r215323, clang-tools-extra: r215324) & carried on with
similar refactoring. (for now I'm focusing on calls to
unique_ptr::release and cleaning those up - there's only one left (and
it'll have to stay - it's designed to leak/bury a pointer) in clang's
include directory - so that's something!)

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola
<rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18 July 2014 19:39, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
>> No objections here. I'd be glad to see this go in. :)
> A +1 from me as well. I really like having the ownership on the type
> instead of a comment or naming convention. Hopefully the overhead is
> never an issue as most functions do not take part in the memory
> management and can take a raw pointer or a reference.
> Cheers,
> Rafael
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

More information about the cfe-dev mailing list