[cfe-dev] RFC: Adding a rename refactoring tool to clang
Richard
legalize at xmission.com
Fri Aug 1 16:03:53 PDT 2014
In article <CAMfx8+eN_p7uyvPHKLOFUXcifnouB-jTm9ZM+XDbBm06qdjmrg at mail.gmail.com>,
Matthew Plant <mplant at google.com> writes:
> As far as I can tell, ad-hoc, when applied to parses, is synonymous with
> "bad"
Yes, because the implication is that they mis-parse invalid constructs
as valid and mis-parse valid constructs as invalid or as other valid
constructs that have different meanings.
To use an archaic colloquiallism adapted to the current sitaution:
"That parser don't match."
<http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/52755/meaning-and-origin-of-that-dog-dont-hunt>
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://ComputerGraphicsMuseum.org>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://LegalizeAdulthood.wordpress.com>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list