[cfe-dev] [RFC] A proposal for #pragma optnone

[Dario Domizioli]

On 30 April 2014 09:18, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:

> On 29 April 2014 23:49, Robinson, Paul
> <Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote:
> > Which cycles us back to the original proposal:
> >
> > #pragma clang optnone [on|off]
> >
> > ...which is obviously tied to the attribute of the same name, which
> > seems like at least a small goodness.
>
> Right, I think my list of arguments has ended. This seems as good as any.
>

Ok... so do we now have a consensus on the original spec?
    #pragma clang optnone on
    // code decorated with optnone
    #pragma clang optnone off

It looks like you're convinced. Anybody else opposing this?

Anyway, I will try to make the implementation have a (thin) layer of API
(something handling the "apply optnone to this function if possible"
functionality) so that we can then use it in the future for the GCC or MSVC
syntax if we want to.
I will also have a look at similar pragmas like the one Reid mentioned
("#pragma
data_seg") for inspiration, and hopefully we'll have some patches coming
soon.



> Just please, keep any new pragmas inside the Clang namespace and it
> should be fine.
>

Yes, at this point it's clear it will have to be in the clang namespace.

Cheers,
    Dario Domizioli
    SN Systems - Sony Computer Entertainment Group
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140430/2e424332/attachment.html>