[cfe-dev] RecursiveASTVisitor not traversing implicitParmVarDecl's in class instantiation methods?
Joshua Naismith
fakju666 at o2.pl
Thu Sep 19 04:02:14 PDT 2013
Thanks, Michael.
That's how I ended up handling the problem, with one exception:
> if (!TSI || D->getTemplateSpecializationKind() != TSK_ImplicitInstantiation) {
s/!=/==
There's one thing I only noticed later when verifying the fix. In this case:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
template <class T>
static T* Foo() {};
class Bar
{
friend Bar* Foo<Bar>();
};
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
"Bar *" isn't visited anymore. Traversing FunctionTypeLoc used to handle function parameters as well as the ResultLoc. Now that this isn't done for implicit instantiations, it has to be explicitly taken care of:
if (TSI)
TRY_TO(TraverseTypeLoc(TSI->getTypeLoc().getAs<FunctionTypeLoc>().getResultLoc()));
I still feel this is all hacky. It'd be great if TypeSourceInfo was unique for instantiations.
/Joshua
> Hi Joshua,
>
> I think something like this should work
>
> TypeSourceInfo *TSI = D->getTypeSourceInfo();
> if (!TSI || D->getTemplateSpecializationKind() != TSK_ImplicitInstantiation) {
> for (FunctionDecl::param_const_iterator I = D->param_begin(),
> E = D->param_end(); I != E; ++I)
> TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(*I));
> } else {
> TRY_TO(TraverseTypeLoc(TSI->getTypeLoc()));
> }
>
> In both cases (special member functions and implicit instantiations) we can't rely on TypeSourceInfo to visit the parameter variable declaration, so need to visit them explicitly. And I think we don't need to test shouldVisitTemplate or shouldVisitImplicit because the code would not reach here here if those returned false.
>
> As for the parameter variable's TypeSourceInfo are the same for the template declaration and the implicit instantiations, I don't know if it is intended or a bug. I'll let someone with more Sema knowledge to comment.
>
> Michael.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cfe-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Joshua Naismith
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:31 PM
> To: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] RecursiveASTVisitor not traversing implicit ParmVarDecl's in class instantiation methods?
>
> > I thought this was fixed recently...
>
> I've found the related bug:
>
> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16182
>
> And the commit:
>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130909/088533.html
>
> It appears that before the patch, parameters of implicit functions were not visited at all. Code was changed to visit parameters, but it visits ParmVarDecl's of the template function, not the instantiated one. I've filed a bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17272
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list