[cfe-dev] Can we make libcxx headers more modular for faster compilation?
Jean-Daniel Dupas
devlists at shadowlab.org
Wed Oct 2 14:36:36 PDT 2013
support.h includes windows.h on win32 platform.
Does libstdc++ also include windows.h. I think this single include may be enough to explain the difference.
Le 2 oct. 2013 à 22:19, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Thanks, I see that now. It wasn't trivial for me...
>
> How can we understand why compiling the trivial program with libcxx is 3x slower vs with libstcd++ ?
>
> Yaron
>
>
>
> 2013/10/2 Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de>
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 06:45:06PM +0300, Yaron Keren wrote:
> > Joerg, I am ashmed to admit I have re-read the code and still can not
> > understand how basic_string uses tuple. How basic_string uses tuple?
>
> basic_string -> __compressed_pair -> __libcpp_compressed_pair_imp
> -> tuple.
>
> Joerg
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
-- Jean-Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20131002/322f02e1/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list