[cfe-dev] Recognize CC and clang-CC?
Alp Toker
alp at nuanti.com
Thu Nov 21 13:46:08 PST 2013
On 07/11/2013 18:18, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 7 Nov 2013, at 18:05, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 05:58:11PM +0000, David Chisnall wrote:
>>> On 7 Nov 2013, at 17:46, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:27:13PM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>>>>> The upper case CC is a traditional UNIX naming of
>>>>> C++ compiler. BSDs follow this, and cmake regards
>>>>> it as the host C++ compiler as well.
>>>> NetBSD doesn't. I'm moderately sure OpenBSD and DragonFly don't either.
>>>> Frankly, I don't know what tradition outside FreeBSD you are talking
>>>> about -- pretty much everyone has been using "c++" as canonical name for
>>>> the C++ compiler for ages.
>>> It's an IRIXism. We're going to be removing CC soon, but for
>>> compatibility it would be nice to have this in, incase users decide
>>> to install the CC -> clang symlink themselves.
>> Provide a shell wrapper as short term workaround with a blinking red
>> warning that this is obsolete?
> This patch is already applied to clang in the FreeBSD tree. It would be nice if it were also applied upstream, so that there are no surprises for people who like CC.
>
> For some reason, CMake prefers CC to c++ when it finds both, and this has caused problems building things that use CMake and C++.
There have been good arguments both for and against the uppercase CC
entry so far but not much in the way of technical solutions addressing
concerns about case-insensitive filesystems.
So how about this..
Assuming we can ignore the clang-CC case, and given that the suffixes
array is searched in order, how about adding a single "CC" entry
directly after "cc" (instead of before as in the original patch)?
This way existing behaviour will be preserved on most systems including
Windows / OS X and legacy installations will still be able to identify
CC as a C++ compiler:
|diff --git a/tools/driver/driver.cpp b/tools/driver/driver.cpp||
||index 3a6a09b..6d30eca 100644||
||--- a/tools/driver/driver.cpp||
||+++ b/tools/driver/driver.cpp||
||@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ static void ParseProgName(SmallVectorImpl<const
char *> &ArgVector,||
|| { "clang-gcc", 0 },||
|| { "clang-cl", "--driver-mode=cl" },||
|| { "cc", 0 },||
||+ { "CC", "--driver-mode=g++" },||
|| { "cpp", "--driver-mode=cpp" },||
|| { "cl" , "--driver-mode=cl" },||
|| { "++", "--driver-mode=g++" },|
I haven't tested this and don't have access to a system where this
matters, but this seems like a viable approach to investigate in order
to reduce vendor patching in FreeBSD.
Alp.
>
> David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
--
http://www.nuanti.com
the browser experts
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20131121/895aeea1/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list