[cfe-dev] Any interest in renaming PLACEHOLDER_TYPE ?
faisalv at gmail.com
Sun May 5 08:59:18 PDT 2013
Some more bike-shedding ...
hamlet_type (type to be or not to be ;)
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Faisal Vali <faisalv at gmail.com> wrote:
> To start the bike-shedding: unresolved_type?
> Faisal Vali
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote:
>> Seems like a reasonable idea; what do you suggest as an alternative?
>> FWIW, I've been using "undeduced type" to mean "type that contains a
>> placeholder type".
>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Faisal Vali <faisalv at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The core portion of the C++ standard denotes a "placeholder type"
>>> differently from its use in Clang. Since clang tends to do a nice job of
>>> mapping most constructs/notions from the standard into intuitive code -
>>> this could stand out as potentially confusing ...
>>> I know this is probably very low priority, but is there any interest in
>>> renaming PLACEHOLDER_TYPE (and the related functions), or is it too late?
>>> Faisal Vali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-dev