[cfe-dev] Any interest in renaming PLACEHOLDER_TYPE ?

Faisal Vali faisalv at gmail.com
Sun May 5 07:00:34 PDT 2013

The core portion of the C++ standard denotes a "placeholder type"
differently from its use in Clang.  Since clang tends to do a nice job of
mapping most constructs/notions from the standard into intuitive code -
this could stand out as potentially confusing ...

I know this is probably very low priority, but is there any interest in
renaming PLACEHOLDER_TYPE (and the related functions), or is it too late?


Faisal Vali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20130505/80b8edb8/attachment.html>

More information about the cfe-dev mailing list