[cfe-dev] RFC: YAML as an intermediate format for clang::tooling::Replacement data on disk
Alex Rosenberg
alexr at ohmantics.com
Wed Jul 31 22:31:56 PDT 2013
YAML was added solely as a test format for lld. It was sold as "better JSON" in that context, in that it had comments and references. I agree with those properties.
Personally, after decades of working with Make, I have decided that I am allergic to significant whitespace. YAML has this misfeature. Yes, this is a bikeshed.
I have wanted for some time for rewriter tools to use diff output that can be used with existing review tools. If a merge tool is created that generates diff, I'd probably be less concerned, but I'd still want a way to handle this self-contained in the LLVM/Clang frameworks without a separate merge process.
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 31, 2013, at 8:39 AM, "Vane, Edwin" <edwin.vane at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This discussion began on cfe-commits as the result of a commit (Tareq's poor header replacement patch that keeps getting reverted due to Windows build-bot issues). The start of the thread is here if you want background info: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130729/084881.html.
>
> The proposal: The C++11 Migrator has a need to write Replacement data: offset, length, and replacement text, to disk. The replacement data describes changes made to a header while transforming one or more TU's. All the replacement data would be gathered up after an entire code-base is transformed by a separate tool and merged together to produce actual changes to headers. So the point is to serialize Replacement data as a form of inter-process communication using the file system as the communication link. Real inter-process communication is a possibility but not portable.
>
> YAML was suggested off-hand in some past patch discussion. Support for reading/writing YAML exists in LLVM. YAML is also meant for human-readable data serialization. It seems like a good choice.
>
> Another option that has been suggested is to just output diffs but as Manuel outlines in http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130729/084904.html, there are some major drawbacks to this technique.
>
> It's worth nothing we don't care to make these change description files full of serialized replacements available to general-purpose diff/merge tools. The only intended consumer is the C++11 Migrator Post-Processor. A prototype of this tool exists at https://github.com/revane/migmerge_git but is soon to be replaced by a tool that has no third-party dependencies so it can live in clang-tools-extra with the migrator.
>
> Are there any other suggestions to address the flow of data between migrator and post-processor? Comments?
>
> --
> Edwin Vane
> Software Developer
> Intel of Canada, Inc.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list