[cfe-dev] CentOS 5.9 build bust: rt sanitizer & incompatible TCP/IP headers
Kostya Serebryany
kcc at google.com
Wed Jul 17 02:04:12 PDT 2013
+samsonov
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Mark Deric <codetech at dericnet.com> wrote:
> While the following partial patch may not be the best approach, it solves
> the compiler build failure problem on RHEL 5 in my sandbox (and probably
> for any Linux 2.x kernel at or before 2.6.18). Ultimately, maybe we should
> avoid holding a compiler build hostage to incompatible TCP/IP headers in a
> target/build host's distribution?
>
> Also, is there an easy way to find out if there's a buildbot slave running
> RHEL5 w/gcc 4.8.1? I waded through some clicks off of
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves, but it wasn't obvious and I thought
> there must be an easier, better way? I could volunteer part of a modest
> box for that duty since it's dear to my heart.
>
> Index: lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc
> ===================================================================
> --- lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc (revision
> 186236)
> +++ lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc (working
> copy)
> @@ -73,8 +73,11 @@
> #include <linux/if_eql.h>
> #include <linux/if_plip.h>
> #include <linux/lp.h>
> +#define SOMETIME_AFTER_LINUX_KERNEL_2_6_18 0 // 1 if newer distro
> +#if SOMETIME_AFTER_LINUX_KERNEL_2_6_18
> #include <linux/mroute.h>
> #include <linux/mroute6.h>
> +#endif // SOMETIME_AFTER_LINUX_KERNEL_2_6_18
> #include <linux/scc.h>
> #include <linux/serial.h>
> #endif // SANITIZER_LINUX && !SANITIZER_ANDROID
> @@ -279,7 +282,7 @@
> unsigned struct_unimapinit_sz = sizeof(struct unimapinit);
> #endif
>
> -#if !SANITIZER_ANDROID
> +#if !SANITIZER_ANDROID && SOMETIME_AFTER_LINUX_KERNEL_2_6_18
> unsigned struct_sioc_sg_req_sz = sizeof(struct sioc_sg_req);
> unsigned struct_sioc_vif_req_sz = sizeof(struct sioc_vif_req);
> #endif
> @@ -330,7 +333,7 @@
> unsigned IOCTL_TIOCSPGRP = TIOCSPGRP;
> unsigned IOCTL_TIOCSTI = TIOCSTI;
> unsigned IOCTL_TIOCSWINSZ = TIOCSWINSZ;
> -#if (SANITIZER_LINUX && !SANITIZER_ANDROID) || SANITIZER_MAC
> +#if (SANITIZER_LINUX && !SANITIZER_ANDROID &&
> SOMETIME_AFTER_LINUX_KERNEL_2_6_18) || SANITIZER_MAC
> unsigned IOCTL_SIOCGETSGCNT = SIOCGETSGCNT;
> unsigned IOCTL_SIOCGETVIFCNT = SIOCGETVIFCNT;
> #endif
>
> Needless to say, getting to a good way to set the manifest constant
> SOMETIME_AFTER_LINUX_KERNEL_2_6_18 is still an open question. I got some
> encouragement that there might be a good GNU autotools way to do this from
> http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/pipermail/xorp-cvs/2009-September/011678.html;
> but this is well outside my sweet spot.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 15:15:33 -0700
> Mark Deric <codetech at dericnet.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the same issue as reported in the "Trouble compiling CLANG on on
> > RHEL 3.0" from 18 June. It applies to CentOS/RHEL 5 as well. Afaict,
> the
> > bust was introduced on 7 June in check in "[compiler-rt] r183517 -
> > [sanitizer] ioctl interceptor"; though that's from code inspection, not
> > from having tried the immediate predecessor. The Clang 3.3 certainly
> > builds fine on CentOS/RHEL 5 using gcc upgraded to 4.8.1 from the
> distro's
> > stock gcc 4.1.2. I did not automate the SVN checkout and build until 24
> > June and have been getting this bust since then; here's last night's try:
> >
> > In file included from
> /mnt/share/RHEL5_local/buildroot/llvm_projects/llvm_svn_wtest_20130712_191043/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc:76:
> > In file included from /usr/include/linux/mroute.h:5:
> > /usr/include/linux/in.h:26:3: error: redefinition of enumerator
> 'IPPROTO_IP'
> > IPPROTO_IP = 0, /* Dummy protocol for TCP
> */
> > ^
> > /usr/include/netinet/in.h:34:21: note: expanded from macro 'IPPROTO_IP'
> > #define IPPROTO_IP IPPROTO_IP
> > ^
> > /usr/include/netinet/in.h:33:5: note: previous definition is here
> > IPPROTO_IP = 0, /* Dummy protocol for TCP. */
> > ^
> >
> > IPPROTO_ICMP, IPPROTO_IGMP, IPPROTO_TCP and a number of other manifest
> > constants/enums collide in later messages. Further, if the build got by
> > this issue, I think it would land on the rocks again with the subsequent
> > include of <linux/mroute6.h> on the next line of
> > sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc since that file does not exist in the
> > CentOS/RHEL 5 distribution.
> >
> > I did a code check of these headers on Ubuntu 12.04 and the organization
> > seems updated and consistent with the compiler-rt sanitizer code. It
> also
> > appears as though there is some effort to do OS/platform detection using
> > manifest constants SANITIZER_LINUX, SANITIZER_ANDROID, etc. But these
> are
> > based on things like "#if defined(__linux__)" and do not appear to be
> > granular enough to accomodate the header differences among Linux'es.
> >
> > I'm a newbie to building/using and looking at Clang so I don't know the
> > idioms for OS/platform detection or the consumer side of sanitizer; and I
> > suspect fixups in those areas are the right way to address this bust.
> >
> > +eugenis following Kostya Serebryany's lead
> >
> > --
> > Mark Deric <codetech at dericnet.com>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-dev mailing list
> > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
> --
> Mark Deric <codetech at dericnet.com>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20130717/13ce219f/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list