[cfe-dev] Release+Asserts equivalent when using Visual Studio on Windows?
Timur Iskhodzhanov
timurrrr at google.com
Thu Jan 24 11:38:41 PST 2013
That's sad.
OK, is there a (simple) way to enable optimizations in the Debug mode
instead? :)
2013/1/24 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:50 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Timur,
>>
>> It seems controlling assertions is disabled on cmake vs. I don't know why.
>> In other generators, LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS can control.
>>
>> ...Takumi
>>
>> 2013/1/24 Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>:
>>> Hello Clang developers,
>>>
>>> Is there any way I can build a Release+Asserts build on Windows in VS?
>>>
>>> I've used Debug builds for "sanity" checking and RelWithDebInfo for
>>> testing large build targets.
>>> However, now that I've spent a day debugging a simple copy-paste
>>> mistake in RelWithDebInfo build which was assert-catchable in Debug
>>> mode,
>>> I think I'd prefer Release+Asserts+DebInfo or Release+Asserts over
>>> Release+DebInfo.
>>>
>>> Is there a simple way I can achieve that?
>>> E.g. some flag to cmake?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> --
>>> Timur
>
> If i remember correctly, MSVC freaks out if you don't have NDEBUG
> defined in Release mode.
>
> - Michael Spencer
--
Timur Iskhodzhanov,
Google Russia
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list