[cfe-dev] Using C++'11 in llvm/clang itself

[Matthieu Monrocq]

Hi Chris,

As I said, I'd like to, however I never got the llvmdev thread in my e-mail
box because I don't subscribe there, which kinda prevents me from replying
to it. Unless there is something I am missing in which I apologize for
being dumb.

If someone involed in the llvmdev thread could reply to it and put me in
copy, I would then be more than happy to discuss it there. I won't have
much to say though, just wanted to contribute the list of features and
their availability to help you all deciding in due knowledge.

-- Matthieu.

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> Please continue this discussion on llvmdev to keep the discussion in one
> place.
>
> -Chris
>
> On Jan 11, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Joshua Cranmer <pidgeot18 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 1/11/2013 2:28 PM, dag at cray.com wrote:
> >> Matthieu Monrocq <matthieu.monrocq at gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> If we move the bar a little higher: gcc 4.6, MSVC 11 (not CRT nov' 12)
> >>> and clang 3.1, we add some features.
> >>>
> >>> - atomic (n2427) / requires MSVC 11
> >>> - forward enum (n2764) / requires gcc 4.6, MSVC 11
> >>> - nullptr (n2431) / requires gcc 4.6
> >>> - strongly-typed enums (n2347) / requires MSVC 11
> >>> - range-based for (n2930) / requires gcc 4.6, MSVC 11
> >> >From your extract it looks like MSVC 11 would also add:
> >>
> >> - decltype (but for gcc not v1.1 - what is that?)
> > MSVC appears to be using it to refer to N3276, which I've briefly looked
> over to see how it changes decltype. The changes in N3276 amount to
> dropping the necessity of having intermediates in the expression as a
> result of function calls being complete types.
> >>
> >> And MSVC 11.0v2 (I don't know what that is)
> > MSVC released a followup update to MSVC 11 (or 2012) which added more
> C++11 features; this is generally called the "November CTP".
> >
> > --
> > Joshua Cranmer
> > News submodule owner
> > DXR coauthor
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-dev mailing list
> > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20130112/ab10e3de/attachment.html>