[cfe-dev] RFC: We should take a more conservative approach to libstdc++ compatibility...

[Krzysztof Parzyszek]

On 1/11/2013 6:17 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> I would weaken it a bit by saying: only use a version higher than this
> hardcoded value if you couldn't find a safer one. Warn all you like
> (with -Wtoo-recent-libstdc++ on by default), but if there is only
> libstdc++-4.9 on my machine and clang refuses to even try to use it,
> that's a pain.

The max value could be overridden by a secret option to "configure".

-Krzysztof


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, 
hosted by The Linux Foundation