[cfe-dev] Problem with gnu libc++ 4.7's chrono in Clang 3.2
Martin Martin
martin at silverliningsystems.com
Thu Jan 3 08:36:43 PST 2013
Hi,
Compiling the following 1-line file:
#include <condition_variable>
Causes the error:
$ clang++ -std=c++11 ./foo.cpp
In file included from ./foo.cpp:1:
In file included from
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../include/c++/4.7/condition_variable:37:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../include/c++/4.7/chrono:539:6:
error: no matching constructor for
initialization of 'duration' (aka 'std::chrono::duration<long,
std::ratio<1, 1000000> >')
: __d(__t.time_since_epoch())
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../include/c++/4.7/condition_variable:110:42:
note: in instantiation of
function template specialization
'std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock,
std::chrono::duration<long,
std::ratio<1, 1000000> > >::time_point<std::chrono::duration<long,
std::ratio<1, 1000000000> > >' requested here
const __clock_t::time_point __s_atime = __s_entry + __delta;
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../include/c++/4.7/chrono:233:12:
note: candidate constructor not viable: no
known conversion from 'duration<[...], ratio<[...], 1000000000>>' to
'duration<[...], ratio<[...], 1000000>>'
for 1st argument
constexpr duration(const duration&) = default;
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../include/c++/4.7/chrono:239:23:
note: candidate template ignored: couldn't
infer template argument ''
constexpr explicit duration(const _Rep2& __rep)
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../include/c++/4.7/chrono:246:14:
note: candidate template ignored: couldn't
infer template argument ''
constexpr duration(const duration<_Rep2, _Period2>& __d)
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../include/c++/4.7/chrono:231:12:
note: candidate constructor not viable:
requires 0 arguments, but 1 was provided
constexpr duration() : __r() { }
^
1 error generated.
Searching the web doesn't turn up anything related.
This is on Ubuntu 12.10, with Clang branches/release_32 compiled from
source in release mode.
Any idea what I should look at next?
Thanks,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20130103/aacd6dd0/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list