[cfe-dev] constructor inheritance in 3.3?
Scott Baldwin
scottbaldwin at gmail.com
Thu Aug 1 04:36:22 PDT 2013
Thanks - I went ahead and upgraded to the latest, 3.4 (trunk 187493) and
works fine now.
BTW - I have found a couple bugs in 3.3 (also in this 3.4 version) that I'm
going to file reports for soon - one involving casting reference-to-volatile
not inducing volatile semantics like it should, the other is incorrect
implementation of std::is_pod. Nothing too critical, but bugs nevertheless.
Overall, you guys make a great product, and competition is always a good
thing... I use gcc also (the latest of 4.8 branch) but recently switched to
using it as my backup compiler instead of primary compiler. Keep up the
good work.
-Scott
From: Du Toit, Stefanus [mailto:stefanus.du.toit at intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 12:50 PM
To: Scott Baldwin; cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] constructor inheritance in 3.3?
Support was completed in 179154:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision
<http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=179154>
&revision=179154
(there have been a few bug fixes since then)
Stefanus
--
Stefanus Du Toit <stefanus.du.toit at intel.com>
Intel Waterloo
From: Scott Baldwin <scottbaldwin at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, 31 July, 2013 7:59 AM
To: "cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu" <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] constructor inheritance in 3.3?
Sorry, to be clear, here is the link I was referring to:
http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html
Also, by "SA" I meant I would have to bother one of our sys admins to
upgrade the software on this environment (if you tell me it is in fact
supported in later version).
From: Scott Baldwin [mailto:scottbaldwin at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 6:57 AM
To: 'cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu'
Subject: constructor inheritance in 3.3?
According to your C++11 support status page, C++11 constructor inheritance
was added in clang 3.3.
I am using clang 3.3 (trunk 176796), but I get the following: "error:
inheriting constructors are not supported"
Was this added in a later version of 3.3? If so, I will need an SA to
upgrade the version, but I do not want to bother him if it is not in 3.3 at
all.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20130801/3ca65044/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list