[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] [Announcement] 3.3 Release Planning!

[Jim Grosbach]

On Apr 3, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:

> On Apr 3, 2013, at 2:07 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 1 April 2013 22:05, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
>> We would like to support ARM again.
>> 
>> Hi Bill,
>> 
>> Glad you asked! ;)
>> 
>> I'm getting the test-suite bot green (a few minor tweaks and we're good) and that should get us well ahead of what we've ever been on ARM. Though, bootstrapping seem to fails a few check-all tests. I'll look into that as soon as the test-suite bot is fully green.
>> 
>> Just to make sure we're talking about the same things, the requirements for release are:
>> 
>> * Green direct check-all (clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 bot, green)
>> * Green direct test-suite (clang-native-arm-lnt bot, almost green)
>> * Green self-host check-all (no bot yet, some failures, will look into it next)
> 
> All of this, yes. :)
> 
>> * Green self-host test-suite?
> 
> This would be nice.
> 
>> * Anything else?
> 
> The above are pretty much the requirements for other binaries. Of course, I expect (hope?) that the community will take each release candidate and test their own code with it.
> 
>> I don't want to have this for release-only, but as continuous integration. Though, I hope it'll be good for all future releases.
>> 
> I do too. The progress you're making is great!
> 
>> It's probably best to produce the binaries on a Cortex-A9 (Panda ES), since they're the most common target and the binaries work quite well on A15s.
>> 
> I agree. Though I'll also let Jim and Evan chime in on what they think.

cortex-a9 sounds fine. It'd be cool if we verified those binaries run on a cortex-a8 and a cortex-a15, too. It'd be very, very strange if they didn't, but hey, catching very, very strange problems is what release testing is for, right? :)

At least for now, I do think we should constrain "ARM is a supported target" to mean armv7. For purposes of testing, armv6 is effectively a different target.

-Jim

> 
> Thank you!
> -bw
> 
>> Sylvestre,
>> 
>> If we do end up creating ARM binaries for the general public, your input and expertise will be greatly appreciated! ;)
>> 
> +1 :)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20130403/e0d0db13/attachment.html>