[cfe-dev] MS 128-bit literals don't always have the correct type

[Stephen Canon]

On Sep 23, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, currently it is misleading and just bad to turn on
> -fms-extensions if one wants 128-bit literals.  Since this is not an
> MS extension, code using this feature does not need other MS
> extensions.

Should support be enabled by default as a clang extension?  Or is there a more appropriate flag to use to control support?  Do we need a new flag just for this?  I have no experience with this corner of policy, and defer to the experts (and/or people who care -- I don't care what flag I need to pass, I just want to have support).

- Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20120923/c5c06eb0/attachment.html>